Defaulting to CMCs When Reported Uncertainty is Lower
We recently found a case where the reported uncertainty on a test via a met/cal procedure was lower than the CMC value on our scope of accreditation. While we have submitted a revision to improve our CMCs, we have to ensure that our reported uncertainties default to the CMC values if they are in fact better (less than) our CMC values.
I have been in communication with Fluke software support and they have suggested using the VSET FSC, however there are hundreds of procedures and going through each one to buffer the accuracies to ensure that they are higher than the CMC is a tremendous task. Is there anyone that has faced thsi issue and fixed it using Met/Cal?
Thank you for your help.
Please sign in to leave a comment.